Mississippi Digital News

The nearly $2.8 billion settlement that has been approved by the NCAA and the nation’s five largest conferences is a historic step toward a more professional model for college sports

Booking.com



Beaver Seeds - Get Out and Grow Spring Sasquatch 300x250

Who gets paid? How much? What to know about the landmark NCAA settlement

MATTER OF FACT. AS THE POLITICAL FUELED ROLLBACK OF DEI DIVERSE CITY EQUITY AND INCLUSION PROGRAMS CONTINUES ACROSS THE COUNTRY, SOME STATES ARE CODIFYING THAT ROLLBACK INTO LAW. THAT INCLUDES FLORIDA, WHERE DEI INITIATIVES ARE NOW BANNED AT PUBLIC COLLEGES. THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA RECENTLY ANNOUNCED IT WOULD ELIMINATE ITS PROGRAM TO COMPLY WITH THE LAW. THAT MOVE TRIGGERED PUSHBACK FROM THE NAACP. IT PUT OUT A LETTER URGING BLACK ATHLETES TO AVOID ATTENDING ANY PUBLIC UNIVERSITIES IN FLORIDA. THIS IS FAR FROM THE FIRST TIME COLLEGE STUDENTS HAVE FOUND THEMSELVES AT THE CROSSROADS BETWEEN ATHLETE AND ACTIVIST. OUR SPECIAL CORRESPONDENT JOEY CHEN TRAVELED TO GEORGIA, WHERE SUPER BOWL CHAMPION TONY MCGEE SHARES HOW HIS ACTIVISM AS A STUDENT ALMOST COST HIM HIS CAREER. MIAMI, 27, AIR FORCE 18. AND WHAT COULD HAVE BEEN A STANDOUT SEASON FOR THE WYOMING COWBOYS IS. IT WAS A CALL OFF THE FIELD THAT COST A YOUNG TONY MCGEE AND 13 OF HIS TEAMMATES EVERYTHING. SO THAT DESTROYED PEOPLE’S ACADEMIC CAREERS, LIVES, THEIR FOOTBALL CAREERS AND THEIR FUTURES. EXACTLY. IN THE FALL OF 1969, NUMBER 12, WYOMING DOMINANT DEFENSE INCLUDED TONY MCGEE, THIRD YEAR TACKLE OUT OF BATTLE CREEK, MICHIGAN. WERE YOU PRETTY PROUD TO GET THAT? YEAH. YES. AND YOU KNOW, EVEN THOUGH I THOUGHT OF OTHER SCHOOLS, I KNEW THE TRADITION. BUT DAYS BEFORE A GAME AGAINST BRIGHAM YOUNG, WYOMING’S BLACK STUDENT ALLIANCE URGED THE TEAM’S AFRICAN-AMERICAN PLAYERS TO TAKE A STAND AGAINST RACIST POLICIES OF THE MORMON CHURCH. MCGEE AND SOME OTHERS WANTED TO HIGHLIGHT ONFIELD MISTREATMENT. THEY PLANNED TO ASK THEIR COACH PERMISSION TO WEAR BLACK ARMBANDS, BUT THEY NEVER GOT A CHANCE. HE CAME OUT AND BEFORE WE SAID ANYTHING, HE SAID, UH, TELL YOU AS IT NOW, YOU NO LONGER A MEMBER OF THE WYOMING FOOTBALL TEAM. HE KICKED YOU OFF? YES. NO EXPLANATION, NO DISCUSSION, NOTHING. THE PROTESTS THAT NEVER ACTUALLY HAPPENED COST ALL OF THE BLACK 14 PLAYERS THEIR SCHOLARSHIPS. NONE OF THEM GOT OFFERS TO PLAY FOR OTHER HIGHLY RANKED SCHOOLS. THE NFL SNUBBED MOST OF THEM. MCGEE WAS ONE OF ONLY TWO WHO MADE IT TO THE PROS, AS SPORTS COLUMNIST KEVIN BLACKISTONE SAYS, THE FATE OF THE BLACK 14 IS JUST ONE EXAMPLE IN A HISTORY OF SACRIFICE THAT WAS A PRICE THAT THEY HAD TO PAY FOR, FOR TRYING TO BRING CHANGE ABOUT AT THE UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING IN TERMS OF BEING SENSITIVE TO BLACK STUDENTS, ISN’T THAT AN AWFULLY HIGH PRICE? IT IS. BUT LIKE FRED HAMPTON WITH THE BLACK PANTHERS SAID, YOU KNOW, PEACE IF YOU’RE WILLING TO FIGHT FOR IT. AND UNFORTUNATELY, IN THIS COUNTRY, MARGINAL PEOPLE, PEOPLE OF COLOR HAVE HAD TO PUT THEIR NECKS ON THE LINE IN ORDER TO MAKE GAINS. AND BLACKISTONE HIGHLIGHTS OTHERS LIKE TEXAS HIGH SCHOOL COACH WILLIE RAY SMITH, ORDERED HIS PLAYERS, INCLUDING HIS SON, THE GREAT BUBBA SMITH, TO STEER CLEAR OF SOUTHERN FOOTBALL POWERHOUSES AS THE SYRACUSE EIGHT PLAYERS WON CONCESSIONS FOR THEIR PROGRAM AFTER THEIR BOYCOTT AND MORE RECENTLY, A MISSOURI PLAYERS BOYCOTT FORCED THE UNIVERSITY’S PRESIDENT TO RESIGN. THAT’S TO NAME JUST A FEW PROOF. BLACKISTONE SAYS THAT BLACK ATHLETES HAVE THE POWER TO TACKLE THE ASSAULT ON DEI. WHEN THOSE ATHLETES UNDERSTAND THEIR ROLE ON CAMPUS, THEIR ROLE IN TERMS OF GENERATING TENS OF MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN REVENUE, AND I THINK THAT THEY THEY ARE IN A GREAT PLACE TO WIELD POWER. I MEAN, IS IT FAIR FOR THEM TO HAVE TO CARRY THAT BURDEN? IT MAY BE A BURDEN, BUT WHEN THEY CAN WIELD THEIR POWER AND UNDERSTAND THEIR AGENCY, IT’S IT’S QUITE A THING TO WITNESS. GIVEN HIS EXPERIENCE WITH THE BLACK 14, MCGEE’S ADVICE TO YOUNG ATHLETES IS MORE NUANCED. YOU GOT TO DO WHAT WORKS FOR YOU FIRST. IF YOU CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE, YOU DO THAT. BUT NUMBER TWO, LET’S BE REALISTIC. DO NOT DO SOMETHING, WHEREAS YOU DO NOT GO TO SCHOOL BECAUSE YOU’RE GIVING UP THAT EDUCATION OPTION. YOU HAVE TO REALLY LOOK BETWEEN THE TWO THINGS AND WHICH ONE IS THE MOST IMPORTANT TO YOU. AND THIS IS MY ARMBAND, THE ONLY ONE STILL HERE FROM THE BLACK 14 AT THE COLLEGE FOOTBALL HALL OF FAME IN ATLANTA. THE 14 ARE FINALLY BEING RECOGNIZED. A LOT OF PLAYERS HAD TO GIVE UP, A LOT, AND A NEW GENERATION, INCLUDING MCGEE’S OWN GRANDSON, CHRISTIAN, ARE LEARNING ABOUT THEIR SACRIFICE. WILL YOU DO IT AGAIN? WHY? AFTER ALL I’VE DONE WHAT? I DO IT AGAIN. YES. YOU KNOW WHY? WHY? BECAUSE I FELT IT WAS THE RIGHT THING. IT WAS SOMETHING THAT HAS CHANGED THE COURSE OF FOOTBALL, NOT JUST FOR MY COLLEGE, BUT THE NEXT YEAR, BYU GOT THEIR FIRST AFRICAN AMERICAN PLAYER. SO RIGHT THERE, I KNEW WE WERE DOING THE RIGHT THING. A PLAY THAT LED TO VICTORY ON THE SIDELINES AND BEYOND. IN ATLANTA. I’M JOEY CHE

Who gets paid? How much? What to know about the landmark NCAA settlement

The nearly $2.8 billion settlement that has been approved by the NCAA and the nation’s five largest conferences is a historic step toward a more professional model for college sports. The plan, which still needs approval from plaintiffs and a federal judge, calls for paying damages to thousands of former and current college athletes who say now-defunct NCAA rules prevented them from earning endorsement money. It also calls for setting up a first-of-its-kind revenue-sharing system for college athletes, which will impact hundreds of schools across the country as early as fall 2025. The key takeaways: Under the settlement, $2.77 billion in damages will be paid over 10 years for approximately 14,000 claims dating to 2016. The original plaintiffs included former Arizona State swimmer Grant House and current TCU basketball player Sedona Prince.Determining how much each athlete gets is a question that will take months to figure out and involve attorneys, the judge and a formula assessing what they are owed. The Big Ten, Big 12, ACC and SEC will be making the largest investment going forward because the settlement includes a proposed revenue-sharing system that will allow schools to commit up to $21 million per year to be paid directly to athletes. The overall commitment, including damages, is expected to be about $300 million per school (there are 69 in all) over 10 years.How that will work is a major question that will take time for schools and conferences to work out. NCAA rules will likely need to be re-written. Schools do not have to make the financial commitment, but not doing so could result in a competitive disadvantage. The NCAA will cover 41% of the $2.77 billion total, with the biggest Division I conferences (the ACC, Big Ten, Big 12, Pac-12 and Southeastern) accounting for 24% and the other five major college football conferences (American Athletic, Mid-American, Conference USA, Mountain West ands Sun Belt) covering 10%.Conferences that compete in the second tier of Division I football, the Championship Subdivision, would cover about 14% and the non-football D-I conferences would be on the hook for 12%.Reduced spending, insurance and reserve funds from the NCAA are expected to cover about $1.2 billion and the rest will be money that would normally be distributed to 352 Division I schools but instead will be withheld. Many smaller schools are worried about the loss of that NCAA money on their budgets. One change that could have the most noticeable impact on the field is a switch from the NCAA’s traditional scholarship limits to using roster size to determine how many athletes a school can have for a particular sport.That could allow the wealthiest schools to provide financial benefits to even more athletes than they already do, trying to gain a competitive advantage. It could also push schools to be more deliberate in deciding how much to invest in certain sports.

The nearly $2.8 billion settlement that has been approved by the NCAA and the nation’s five largest conferences is a historic step toward a more professional model for college sports.

The plan, which still needs approval from plaintiffs and a federal judge, calls for paying damages to thousands of former and current college athletes who say now-defunct NCAA rules prevented them from earning endorsement money.

It also calls for setting up a first-of-its-kind revenue-sharing system for college athletes, which will impact hundreds of schools across the country as early as fall 2025.

The key takeaways:

Under the settlement, $2.77 billion in damages will be paid over 10 years for approximately 14,000 claims dating to 2016. The original plaintiffs included former Arizona State swimmer Grant House and current TCU basketball player Sedona Prince.

Determining how much each athlete gets is a question that will take months to figure out and involve attorneys, the judge and a formula assessing what they are owed.

The Big Ten, Big 12, ACC and SEC will be making the largest investment going forward because the settlement includes a proposed revenue-sharing system that will allow schools to commit up to $21 million per year to be paid directly to athletes. The overall commitment, including damages, is expected to be about $300 million per school (there are 69 in all) over 10 years.

How that will work is a major question that will take time for schools and conferences to work out. NCAA rules will likely need to be re-written. Schools do not have to make the financial commitment, but not doing so could result in a competitive disadvantage.

The NCAA will cover 41% of the $2.77 billion total, with the biggest Division I conferences (the ACC, Big Ten, Big 12, Pac-12 and Southeastern) accounting for 24% and the other five major college football conferences (American Athletic, Mid-American, Conference USA, Mountain West ands Sun Belt) covering 10%.

Conferences that compete in the second tier of Division I football, the Championship Subdivision, would cover about 14% and the non-football D-I conferences would be on the hook for 12%.

Reduced spending, insurance and reserve funds from the NCAA are expected to cover about $1.2 billion and the rest will be money that would normally be distributed to 352 Division I schools but instead will be withheld.

Many smaller schools are worried about the loss of that NCAA money on their budgets.

One change that could have the most noticeable impact on the field is a switch from the NCAA’s traditional scholarship limits to using roster size to determine how many athletes a school can have for a particular sport.

That could allow the wealthiest schools to provide financial benefits to even more athletes than they already do, trying to gain a competitive advantage. It could also push schools to be more deliberate in deciding how much to invest in certain sports.



Source link