Mississippi Digital News

We told Trump not to claim quick victory

0
Booking.com


Beaver Seeds - Get Out and Grow Spring Sasquatch 300x250

Jan. 6 witnesses: We told Trump not to claim quick victory



thank you. Mr Chairman Mr Xiao old. I’d like you to explain *** turn that was thrown around *** lot during the election and that’s the so called red mirage. What does that mean? So In the 40 or 50 years let’s say that Americans have increasingly chosen to vote by mail or early or absentee. Democrats prefer that method of voting more than republicans do. So basically in every election, republicans win election Day and democrats win the early vote and then you wait and start counting and it depends on which ones you count first but usually it’s election day votes that get counted first and you see the Republican shoot ahead and then the process of bailing and binding and unbinding all those mail in votes uh in some states like pennsylvania refused to count the votes first. So you have to wait for all of that to come in. So in every election certainly *** national election you expect to see the Republican with *** lead but it’s not really *** lead. Um When you put together *** jigsaw puzzle, it doesn’t matter which piece you put in first, it ends up with the same image. So for us who cares? But that’s because no candidate had ever tried to avail themselves of this quirk in the election counting system. We had gone to pains uh and I’m proud of the pains we went to to make sure that we were informing viewers that this was gonna happen because the trump campaign and the president had made it clear that they were going to try to exploit this anomaly. And we knew it was gonna be bigger because the percentage of early votes was higher, right? We went from about 45% of the votes being early and absentee too because of the pandemic that increased by about 50%. So we knew it would be longer. We knew it would be more. So we wanted to keep telling viewers, hey look, the number that you see here is sort of irrelevant because it’s only *** small percentage of these votes. So this red mirage, that’s really what you expected to happen on Election Night happens every time. Thank you Mr Star walt. I’d like to play *** clip of Attorney General Bill Barr who also explains what was expected to happen on election night, right out of the box on election night. The President claimed that there was major fraud underway. I mean, this happened as far as I could tell before, there was actually any potential of looking at evidence and it seemed to be based on the dynamics that that at the end of the evening *** lot of Democratic votes came in which changed the vote counts in certain states. And that seemed to be the basis for this broad claim that there was major fraud. And I didn’t think much of that because people have been talking for weeks and everyone understood for weeks that that was going to be what happened on election night. Mr Stepien obviously could not be with us today and it’s proper for him to be with his wife as they welcome their child. But he also had discussions with the President about the red mirage. That is that it would be *** long night and that early votes would favor him but lots more votes would be counted over the course of the night and the days after. So let’s play *** clip one from our interview with Mr Stepien. Ii recounted back to that conversation with him in which I said just like I said in 2016 was gonna be *** long night. I told him in 2020 that um you know there were it was gonna be *** process again. Um as you know the the early returns are gonna be you know positive and we’re gonna you know be watching the returns of ballots as you know they rolled in thereafter. So is it fair to say you’re trying to present what you thought would be *** realistic picture of what might happen over the course of that night being election night that night and the days that followed? Yeah I I always uh I always you know I always told the President the truth and uh you know I you know I think he expected that from me and I told him it was gonna be *** process, it was gonna be you know you know we have to wait and see how this turned out. Um so I just like I did in 2016, I did the same thing in 2020. So let’s watch *** short clip of President trump speaking after he received that information from his campaign advisers, we want all voting to stop, We don’t want them to find any ballots that 4:00 AM and add them to the list. So when former President Trump said that it contradicted what his advisers had warned would happen, we all know that mail in ballots played an important role in the 2020 election. However, President trump continuously discouraged mail in voting. Mr Stepien was so concerned about the president’s position on mail in voting that in the summer of 2020, he met with President trump along with House minority Leader Kevin McCarthy. Let’s play clip four meeting that was had um in particular. Um I invited Kevin McCarthy to join the meeting. He being of like, mind on the issue with me um in which we made our case for for why we believed mail and balloting mail and voting um not to be *** bad thing for his campaign. Um but you know, the President’s mind was was was made up. And you understand um you know how many times to, you know, go to the well on *** particular topic. Yeah, I understand, tell me *** little bit more about the argument that you and mr McCarthy made to the President in that meeting as to why it wasn’t *** bad thing that mail and voting was available, Largely two pillars to that argument, both of which I’ve previously mentioned. one, you know, leaving *** good deal to chance. Uh huh. Pushing or urging your voters to vote only on Election day leaves *** lot to chance. Um That’s that’s *** and B. Also previously mentioned um the fact that the trump campaign Republican National Committee, the Republican Party, had an advantage of grassroots workers and volunteers on the ground that would allow um you know, an advantage to enhance return rates of ballots that were mailed. Those were the two Yeah, I say. And what if anything, do you recall Representative McCarthy saying during that meeting, we were we were echoing the same argument. I mean, his his words echoed echoed mine and and vice versa on those, on those two topics. Mr Star wall, you were at the decision desk at Fox News on Election night and you called Arizona early for president biden, which was controversial. How did you make that call? And where did you think the race stood in the early hours of the next day? Well, it was really controversial to our competitors who we beat so badly by making the correct call first. Our decision desk was the best in the business, and I was very proud to be *** part of it because we had we had partnered with the Associated Press and the National Opinion Research center at the University of Chicago. Thanks to my colleague and friend ARN in michigan had built *** wonderful device for forecasting the outcomes of elections. So we had *** different set of data than our competitors did. We had more research and we had *** better system and we had *** great team. Um, so what you’re waiting to see is do the actual votes match up with the expectations in the poll. The real votes are testing the quality of your pole in targeted precincts and in targeted places. And let me tell you our poll in, Arizona was beautiful and it was doing just what we wanted it to do. And it was cooking up just right and at some point and I forget exactly who, but at some point it became clear that Arizona was getting ready to make *** call. So we around, uh, you know, my boss, Bill Sammon said we’re not making any call until everybody says yes because that was always our policy unit anonymity. And you have to understand in this room, you have, you know, the best people from academia democrats, republicans, *** broad cross section of people who had worked together for *** decade were really serious about this stuff. So we knew it would be *** consequential call because it was one of five states that really mattered right. Wisconsin michigan pennsylvania Georgia. Arizona were the ones that we were watching. We knew it would be significant to call any one of those five, But we already knew trump’s chances were very small and getting smaller based on what we had seen. So we were able to make the call early. Uh we were able to beat the competition. Uh we looked around the room, everybody says, yay, and on we go. And by the time we found out how much everybody was freaking out and losing their minds over this call, we were already trying to call the next day. We had already moved on. We were in Georgia, we were to north Carolina, we were looking at these other states. So we thought it was, we were pleased, but not surprised, You know, after the election as of November seven in your judgment, what were the chances of president trump winning the election after that point? Yes. I mean, I guess you could, it’s always possible that you could have, you know, *** truckload of ballots be found somewhere, I suppose. But once you get into this space, you know, um, ahead of today. I thought about what are the largest margins that could ever be overturned by *** recount? And the normal kind of the kind of stuff that we heard mike pence talking about sounding like *** normal Republican that night when he said, you know, we’ll keep every challenge, nothing like that in *** recount. You’re talking about hundreds of votes when we think about calling *** race? One of the things that we would think about is is it outside the margin of *** recount? And when we think about that margin, we think about in modern history, you’re talking about 1000 votes, 1500 votes at the way, way outside. Normally, you’re talking about hundreds of votes, maybe 300 votes that are going to change. So the idea that through any normal process in any of these states, remember he had to do it thrice right? He needed three of these states to change. And in order to do that. I mean, you’re you’re at an infant, you’re better off to play the powerball, uh, than to have that come in on november 7th. The other major news outlets called the race for president, biden. Now, Mr Stepien told the committee that he thought the odds were, and this is *** quote, very, very, very bleak and held *** meeting with the president that same day. Let’s show clip, eight video clip eight with each day that wore on. I mean, the trajectory of the race on election night trump ahead um in in in many states. And as that week we’re on, as the third became the fourth, became the fifth and so on and so forth. And the vote by mail ballots were tabulated, you know, trump’s trump’s lead, you know, grew more narrow and and and some places biden surpassed, you know, trump in the vote totals. So as the week we’re on as we paid attention to those numbers every single multiple times *** day um You know, internally um you know, I I was feeling less confident for sure what was your view on the state of the election at that point? Um You know, very very very bleak. Um You know, I we we told him um the group that went over there outlined, you know, My belief and chances for success at this point. And then we pegged that at you know, five maybe 10% based on recounts that were that that you know, either were automatically initiated or or could be could be initiated based on you know, realistic legal challenges. Not all the legal challenges that eventually were pursued, but you know, it was, you know, My belief is that it was very very 5-10%. It’s not *** very good optimistic outlook. Now as President trump and others continued to claim that the election was stolen. There were lawyers who were part of the campaign campaign lawyers who were responsible for investigating the fraud claims that includes Alex Cannon, who could not validate the claims that were being made, including those being made by the president. That’s roll video 15. This is an email, what It’s two emails actually the first is from Alex Cannon to You and Faith McPherson. And then you forward that email on to Mark Meadows Justin clark and Jason miller. The subject being az federal I. D. Voters. Um If you look at the original email there said Bill, we completed the Az analysis you requested, I assume that’s about Arizona. Um And because of the substantial uncertainty surrounding the databases, this is *** highly unreliable way to identify ineligible voters. Can you explain the task that you gave to Miss Cannon um for this Arizona analysis? Sure. Um previously I um describe some of my frustration with some of the claims that people would would throw up President trump regarding, you know, Yeah, I need to look at this, you know, this happened in this state or that happened in that state and it would be, you know, those would flow to us um to look into. I talked about that before, I think, you know, this is an example of that. I recall, I recall um in Arizona someone had thrown out, I believe this to be the claim that there were thousands of um illegal citizens people not eligible to vote having cast their ballots in Arizona someone had thrown out that claim to President trump. Um and with, you know, the margins being as close as they were, as previously described, you know, that could potentially matter. Um So this wild claim was thrown out, which, you know, on his face didn’t seem, you know, realistic or possible with me. Um I asked Alex to look at the, you know, the claim and I haven’t read this full email, but I recall the response to that um the reality that was not illegal citizens voting in the election, It was like overseas voters voting in the election. So obviously people who are eligible to vote when these findings were passed up the chain to president trump. He became frustrated and he replaced the campaign’s legal team. Let’s play Clip 14. You know, I think the president um it was during the second week where things like you displayed were occurring where he was growing increasingly and happy with um you know, his team, you know, me less so because I was less involved at this point, but still me, um probably increasingly unhappy with Justin clark. Um and that that kind of, you know, um you know, paved the way for, you know, Justin to be moved out and marriage early on to be moved in as the person in charge of, you know, the legal side of the campaign and for all intents and purposes campaign at that point. Now, when Mr Stepien became campaign manager, he was the second uh trump campaign manager for the 2020 race. And there were only about 100 and 15 days until Election Day. So let’s play uh the video, um I inherited *** campaign that was the day I was hired was Believe President Trump’s low point in the 2020 daily average polling against president biden. It was, it was *** campaign at *** low point in the polls. Um It was structurally and fiscally deficient. Um you know, I, you know, there was *** great deal wrong with the campaign in both of those um in both of those areas. Um so most of my day spent fixing what, And I think I took over with 115 days left in the campaign. Most of my time spent fixing the things that could be fixed With 115 days left in the campaign. Now, Mr Stepien has been in the campaign field for *** long time and he worked for lots of different candidates and campaigns. He testified to this committee about his concerns, given the claims that Mr Giuliani and MS Powell and their team were making *** publicly let’s play clip, 15, okay. And was it important for you, Mr Stepien to sort of pull back just for your own professional reputation? You didn’t want to be associated with some of what you were hearing from the Giuliani team and others that that sort of stepped in in the wake of your departure. I didn’t mind being categorized, there were two groups of family we call them kind of my team and Rudy’s team. I didn’t mind being characterized as being part of team normal as as reporters, you know, kind of started to do around that point in time. Um you know, I said, you know, hours ago, early on that, You know, I’ve been doing this for *** long time. Um 25 years and I’ve spanned, you know, political ideologies from trump to McCain, to Bush to Christie, you know, and, you know, I can work under *** lot of circumstances for *** lot of varied, you know, candidates and politicians, but situation where, and I think along the way, I’ve built up *** pretty good, I hope *** good reputation for being honest and professional, and I I didn’t think what was happening was necessarily honest or professional at that point in time. So that led to me stepping away.

Donald Trump’s campaign manager Bill Stepien and other top aides testified Monday at the House committee investigating the Jan. 6 Capitol attack that they believed the 2020 presidential race was too close to call on Election Night, but Trump nevertheless declared himself the winner.Stepien abruptly backed out of appearing live Monday at the hearing, because his wife went into labor. But the panel marched ahead after a morning scramble, showing previously recorded testimony from the ex-campaign manager and others close to the president, including Ivanka Trump.Video above: Jan. 6 witnesses discuss so-called ‘red mirage’ “My belief, my recommendation was to say that votes were still being counted, it’s too early to tell, too early to call the race.” Stepien said in the recorded testimony.Asked if anyone disagreed with him, Stepien replied that Trump “thought I was wrong. He told me so.”The House committee investigating the Jan. 6 Capitol riot opened its hearing Monday counting Stepien as a key witness. The panel is delving deeper into what it calls the “big lie,” the defeated Republican president’s false claims of voter fraud that fueled his efforts to overturn the 2020 election and provoked a mob of his supporters to lay siege to the U.S. Capitol.Chairman Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., opened the hearing saying Trump “betrayed the trust of the American people” and “tried to remain in office when people had voted him out.”Instead of his live testimony, the panel relied on Stepien’s previously recorded interview with the panel, given behind closed doors, about what the campaign team was telling Trump as he lost the election. A longtime Trump ally, Stepien had been subpoenaed to appear at the open hearing.Stepien and senior adviser Jason Miller testified that the festive mood at the White House on election night turned as Fox News announced Trump had lost the state of Arizona to Joe Biden, and aides worked to cousnel Trump on what to do next. They pushed back against Rudy Giuliani who was encouraging Trump to declare himself the winner.Monday’s hearing also was featuring other live witnesses, including Chris Stirewalt, a former Fox News Channel political editor who declared on Election Night that Arizona was being won by Biden.Committee members say they have uncovered enough evidence for the Justice Department to consider an unprecedented criminal indictment against the former president. Thompson, D-Miss., and vice chair Rep. Liz Cheney, R-Wyo., were leading the hearing after last week’s blockbuster session drew nearly 20 million Americans to see its prime-time findings.For the past year, the committee has been investigating the most violent attack on the Capitol since the War of 1812 to ensure such an assault never happens again. Lawmakers hope to show that Trump’s effort to overturn Joe Biden’s election victory posed a grave threat to democracy.Stepien, who remains close to Trump, oversaw the “conversion” of Trump’s presidential campaign to a “Stop the Steal” effort, according to a subpoena issued by the committee last fall. He was to face questions about what those in Trump’s inner circle were telling the president about the election results. Stepien is now a top campaign adviser to the Trump-endorsed House candidate, Harriet Hageman, who is challenging Cheney in the Wyoming Republican primary election.Trump spokesman Taylor Budowich suggested Sunday that the committee’s decision to call Stepien was politically motivated.A second group of witnesses testifying Monday was to be made up of election officials, investigators and experts who were likely to discuss Trump’s responses to the election, including dozens of failed court challenges, and how his actions diverged from U.S. norms.Among them those witnesses is the former U.S. attorney in Atlanta, BJay Pak, who abruptly resigned after Trump pressured Georgia state officials to overturn his presidential defeat. Trump wanted to fire Pak as disloyal, but Pak stepped down after Trump’s call urging Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger to “find” enough votes to overturn Biden’s win in the state became public.The panel will also hear from former Philadelphia City Commissioner Al Schmidt, the only Republican on the election board and who faced down criticism as the state’s election was called for Biden, and noted Washington attorney and elections lawyer Benjamin Ginsberg.As he mulls another White House run, Trump insists the committee’s investigation is a “witch hunt.” Last week he said Jan. 6 “represented the greatest movement in the history of our country.”Nine people died in the riot and its aftermath, including a Trump supporter, shot and killed by police. More than 800 people have been arrested in the siege, and members of two extremist groups have been indicted on rare sedition charges over their roles leading the charge into the Capitol.In its prime-time hearing, the committee laid out how Trump was told over and over again by his trusted aides and officials at the highest levels of government that there was no election fraud on a scale that could have changed the outcome. But Trump pursued his false claims about the election and beckoned supporters to Washington on Jan. 6 to overturn Biden’s victory as Congress was set to certify the Electoral College results.Additional evidence is to be released in hearings this week focusing on Trump’s decision to ignore the outcome of the election and the court cases that ruled against him.Monday’s hearing was also turning to the millions of fundraising dollars Trump’s team brought in in the run-up to Jan. 6, according to a committee aide who insisted on anonymity to discuss the details.The committee has said most of those interviewed in the investigation are coming forward voluntarily, although some have demanded subpoenas to appear in public.Lawmakers indicated that perhaps their most important audience member over the course of the hearings may be Attorney General Merrick Garland, who must decide whether his department can and should prosecute Trump. They left no doubt as to their own view whether the evidence is sufficient to proceed.”Once the evidence is accumulated by the Justice Department, it needs to make a decision about whether it can prove to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt the president’s guilt or anyone else’s,” said Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif, a panel member.. “But they need to be investigated if there’s credible evidence, which I think there is.”Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., another member said on CNN he doesn’t intend to “browbeat” Garland but noted the committee has already laid out in legal pleadings the criminal statutes members believe Trump violated.”I think that he knows, his staff knows, the U.S. attorneys know, what’s at stake here,” Raskin said.No president or ex-president has ever been indicted. Garland has not said whether he would be willing to prosecute.

Donald Trump’s campaign manager Bill Stepien and other top aides testified Monday at the House committee investigating the Jan. 6 Capitol attack that they believed the 2020 presidential race was too close to call on Election Night, but Trump nevertheless declared himself the winner.

Stepien abruptly backed out of appearing live Monday at the hearing, because his wife went into labor. But the panel marched ahead after a morning scramble, showing previously recorded testimony from the ex-campaign manager and others close to the president, including Ivanka Trump.

Video above: Jan. 6 witnesses discuss so-called ‘red mirage’

“My belief, my recommendation was to say that votes were still being counted, it’s too early to tell, too early to call the race.” Stepien said in the recorded testimony.

Asked if anyone disagreed with him, Stepien replied that Trump “thought I was wrong. He told me so.”

The House committee investigating the Jan. 6 Capitol riot opened its hearing Monday counting Stepien as a key witness. The panel is delving deeper into what it calls the “big lie,” the defeated Republican president’s false claims of voter fraud that fueled his efforts to overturn the 2020 election and provoked a mob of his supporters to lay siege to the U.S. Capitol.

Chairman Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., opened the hearing saying Trump “betrayed the trust of the American people” and “tried to remain in office when people had voted him out.”

Instead of his live testimony, the panel relied on Stepien’s previously recorded interview with the panel, given behind closed doors, about what the campaign team was telling Trump as he lost the election. A longtime Trump ally, Stepien had been subpoenaed to appear at the open hearing.

Stepien and senior adviser Jason Miller testified that the festive mood at the White House on election night turned as Fox News announced Trump had lost the state of Arizona to Joe Biden, and aides worked to cousnel Trump on what to do next. They pushed back against Rudy Giuliani who was encouraging Trump to declare himself the winner.

Monday’s hearing also was featuring other live witnesses, including Chris Stirewalt, a former Fox News Channel political editor who declared on Election Night that Arizona was being won by Biden.

Committee members say they have uncovered enough evidence for the Justice Department to consider an unprecedented criminal indictment against the former president.

Thompson, D-Miss., and vice chair Rep. Liz Cheney, R-Wyo., were leading the hearing after last week’s blockbuster session drew nearly 20 million Americans to see its prime-time findings.

For the past year, the committee has been investigating the most violent attack on the Capitol since the War of 1812 to ensure such an assault never happens again. Lawmakers hope to show that Trump’s effort to overturn Joe Biden’s election victory posed a grave threat to democracy.

Stepien, who remains close to Trump, oversaw the “conversion” of Trump’s presidential campaign to a “Stop the Steal” effort, according to a subpoena issued by the committee last fall. He was to face questions about what those in Trump’s inner circle were telling the president about the election results. Stepien is now a top campaign adviser to the Trump-endorsed House candidate, Harriet Hageman, who is challenging Cheney in the Wyoming Republican primary election.

Trump spokesman Taylor Budowich suggested Sunday that the committee’s decision to call Stepien was politically motivated.

A second group of witnesses testifying Monday was to be made up of election officials, investigators and experts who were likely to discuss Trump’s responses to the election, including dozens of failed court challenges, and how his actions diverged from U.S. norms.

Among them those witnesses is the former U.S. attorney in Atlanta, BJay Pak, who abruptly resigned after Trump pressured Georgia state officials to overturn his presidential defeat. Trump wanted to fire Pak as disloyal, but Pak stepped down after Trump’s call urging Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger to “find” enough votes to overturn Biden’s win in the state became public.

The panel will also hear from former Philadelphia City Commissioner Al Schmidt, the only Republican on the election board and who faced down criticism as the state’s election was called for Biden, and noted Washington attorney and elections lawyer Benjamin Ginsberg.

As he mulls another White House run, Trump insists the committee’s investigation is a “witch hunt.” Last week he said Jan. 6 “represented the greatest movement in the history of our country.”

Nine people died in the riot and its aftermath, including a Trump supporter, shot and killed by police. More than 800 people have been arrested in the siege, and members of two extremist groups have been indicted on rare sedition charges over their roles leading the charge into the Capitol.

In its prime-time hearing, the committee laid out how Trump was told over and over again by his trusted aides and officials at the highest levels of government that there was no election fraud on a scale that could have changed the outcome. But Trump pursued his false claims about the election and beckoned supporters to Washington on Jan. 6 to overturn Biden’s victory as Congress was set to certify the Electoral College results.

Additional evidence is to be released in hearings this week focusing on Trump’s decision to ignore the outcome of the election and the court cases that ruled against him.

Monday’s hearing was also turning to the millions of fundraising dollars Trump’s team brought in in the run-up to Jan. 6, according to a committee aide who insisted on anonymity to discuss the details.

The committee has said most of those interviewed in the investigation are coming forward voluntarily, although some have demanded subpoenas to appear in public.

Lawmakers indicated that perhaps their most important audience member over the course of the hearings may be Attorney General Merrick Garland, who must decide whether his department can and should prosecute Trump. They left no doubt as to their own view whether the evidence is sufficient to proceed.

“Once the evidence is accumulated by the Justice Department, it needs to make a decision about whether it can prove to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt the president’s guilt or anyone else’s,” said Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif, a panel member.. “But they need to be investigated if there’s credible evidence, which I think there is.”

Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., another member said on CNN he doesn’t intend to “browbeat” Garland but noted the committee has already laid out in legal pleadings the criminal statutes members believe Trump violated.

“I think that he knows, his staff knows, the U.S. attorneys know, what’s at stake here,” Raskin said.

No president or ex-president has ever been indicted. Garland has not said whether he would be willing to prosecute.



Source link

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.